8 Best Device Fingerprint Providers: A 2025 Comparison

In our latest device fingerprint solution comparison, we put together 8 leading providers in the market, using real-world metrics that reflect the needs of risk and fraud teams in 2025.

5 minutes

Tanya

Know Your Users’ Digital Identity to Detect Fraud
Get comprehensive guide about email, phone number and IP profiling – its usage to prevent fraud at each stage of the user journey, detailed data you can get and how you can start a free trial.
Download the Whitepaper

Among the solutions evaluated, TrustDecision stands out as a high-performance provider with proven strength across critical areas — including spoof detection, fingerprint persistence, and real-time risk intelligence.

A Practical Comparison for Risk Leaders Who Want Results

When a fraudster creates hundreds of fake accounts, resets devices between loan applications, or scales bot attacks across mobile and web — the traces they leave behind don’t lie.

Not if you're tracking the right signals.

Device fingerprinting, when done well, gives platforms the ability to link behaviors across identities, spot anomalies in real time, and stop abuse before it affects revenue or reputation. But not all fingerprinting solutions are built for today’s fraud landscape — and choosing the wrong one can leave gaps that sophisticated actors exploit.

That’s why we conducted a hands-on evaluation of 8 leading device fingerprint providers, including TrustDecision, Fingerprint, Shield, SEON, Sift, CredoLab, ThreatMetrix, and HUMAN Security. Each provider was assessed using clearly defined metrics that reflect the demands of today’s risk and fraud teams.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is based on the available data, online research, and our manual testing. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is important to conduct thorough research and evaluation before making any decisions regarding device fingerprinting solutions.

Evaluation Metrics for Enterprise-Grade Device Fingerprinting

When selecting a device fingerprinting provider, it’s not just about whether they can generate an ID — it’s about how well they perform under real-world pressure. That’s why we focused our evaluation on the metrics that matter most to risk teams:

Uniqueness tests whether the same device can be reliably recognized across different apps or browser sessions. This is essential for identifying repeat users, preventing multi-account abuse, and linking cross-platform behavior.

Persistence measures how well the fingerprint holds up after a user attempts to reset or disguise their device — whether by using virtual spaces, changing system attributes, or performing a factory reset. Without persistence, fraudsters can return undetected.

Risk Identifiers go a step further, assessing whether the solution can detect signs of fraud manipulation — such as spoofed location, lack of SIM card, modified device parameters, or replay attacks. These are common in loan fraud, bot traffic, and emulator-based abuse.

Code Protection ensures the fingerprinting logic itself can’t be tampered with. In high-risk environments, SDKs and JavaScript need to be hardened against reverse engineering to prevent attackers from faking trusted fingerprints.

Compliance reflects the provider’s readiness to meet global standards like GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS, and ISO. This isn’t just a checkbox — it ensures the solution is safe to use in regulated industries like finance, payments, and digital commerce.

Each parameter was chosen for its relevance to real-world fraud scenarios, not just technical performance. Together, they reveal which providers are ready for today’s threats — and which ones fall short.

The 8 Device Fingerprint Solutions Providers We Reviewed

TrustDecision

Built for high-risk, high-scale environments. TrustDecision offers persistent, spoof-resistant device identification with built-in risk scoring and emulator detection. It supports Android, iOS, web, mini programs, and WebView, and integrates directly with a real-time decisioning engine. In production, clients have seen a 19% reduction in false positives without compromising fraud prevention.

Fingerprint

Formerly FingerprintJS, it’s known for developer-friendliness and strong web fingerprinting capabilities. Open-source roots make it appealing for customization, but mobile and spoofing defense features are more limited compared to enterprise fraud platforms.

Shield

A bot defense-focused platform with real-time analysis capabilities. Performs well against automated abuse, particularly for digital commerce use cases, though less configurable for financial-grade fraud patterns.

SEON

Lightweight fraud prevention tool with basic fingerprinting as part of its suite. Easy to adopt and integrates social signals for risk assessment. Strong for entry-level fraud prevention, but persistence and emulator detection remain weaker.

Sift

Part of a trust and safety platform that uses behavioral analytics alongside fingerprinting. Works well as part of a larger ecosystem, but fingerprinting is not a standalone strength.

CredoLab

Leverages alternative mobile data for credit risk assessment. Its fingerprinting is persistent on mobile, but usage is more geared toward lending decisioning than broad-spectrum fraud detection.

HUMAN Security (formerly PerimeterX)

Now part of HUMAN Security, PerimeterX’s fingerprinting technology is positioned within bot and web defense. Strong in browser-side protection, though mobile support and device linking are less of a focus.

ThreatMetrix (LexisNexis)

Offers global device intelligence and behavioral analytics, often bundled into LexisNexis solutions. Strong legacy credibility, but setup and integration can be complex and resource-intensive.

Which Solution Stands Out the Most?

Comparison table: 8 Leading Device Fingerprint Providers

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is based on the available data, online research, and our manual testing. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is important to conduct thorough research and evaluation before making any decisions regarding device fingerprinting solutions.

Conclusion

Among the solutions evaluated, TrustDecision stands out as a high-performance provider with proven strength across critical areas — including spoof detection, fingerprint persistence, and real-time risk intelligence. It not only meets technical benchmarks but also aligns with enterprise-level security and compliance requirements.

While other providers may suit specific use cases, TrustDecision delivers the most balanced combination of accuracy, risk coverage, and integration readiness. Its capabilities extend beyond simple device ID generation, supporting fraud prevention strategies in sectors where security and reliability are non-negotiable — such as digital banking, lending, payments, and high-traffic e-commerce platforms.

Choosing the right fingerprinting provider is not just about technology — it’s about ensuring long-term protection, reducing operational risk, and scaling safely. This comparison gives you the clarity to choose confidently, with TrustDecision offering a future-ready solution built for real-world fraud challenges.

Ready to take a proactive approach to fraud prevention? Explore how TrustDecision can support your platform’s growth and security. Let’s chat!

Subscribe to our newsletter to get real insights, fraud analysis, innovative technology updates and latest industry trends

Related Posts

Let’s chat!

Let us get to know your business needs, and answer any questions you may have about us. Then, we’ll help you find a solution that suits you

CTA